Using process mining approaches, process routes could now be clustered and the solution space for model building reduced. Based on a decision tree procedure, a model was then developed which, with the help of the customer specification, derived an ideal work plan based on which, a target price was automatically calculated.
Based on the test data, a model quality of over 95% was finally achieved, i.e. the automatically estimated costing-relevant parameters matched the human planning with a high degree of accuracy.
ML creates the optimal process route
So how does the automated model go about creating the routing? First of all, it decides whether it is a rough or a fine train. This already significantly limits the selection of possible routes. The decision is based on the required draw ratio, i.e. the ratio of the initial to the final diameter. Secondly, a decision is made on the feedstock. This must have a next larger diameter and be of the same quality. In the third step, the model predicts a binary code for each machine and thus determines whether it will be used. In the fourth and final step, the model determines the process parameters relevant for the calculation.
Supervised machine learning methods were used to create a handful of models: Generalized Linear Model, Deep Learning, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosted Trees and Support Vector Machine. For the specific example of 1.6 mm wire to 0.45 mm wire, the decision tree demonstrated the best relationship of model quality to computation time and understandability. Figure 3 shows this tree. There you can see that the model predicted the correct path with an accuracy of about 98% with only two parameters.